Dating blog ru


10-Feb-2017 11:21

More and more of today’s love stories start with people making contact on the Internet starts with the following: “I was going to bed at two o’clock in the morning and frequently visiting the site to check whether Dima had sent me a reply or not.

dating blog ru-45

united states dating traditions

The company started with the e Harmony model and is now moving to dominate the Russian online dating niche.Moreover, the site does not carry any advertising: makes its money from paid-for services.As with e Harmony.com, the only free things on the site are registration and the selection of the most psychologically compatible partner: if users want to make contact and see photos of their potential “other halves,” they have to fork out some money: a one-month contact costs , three months costs , six months , and one year .will not reveal how big the original investment in its project was.

The only thing known is that the start-up received money from the Fast Lane Ventures fund, whose standard seed investment is between 0,000 and

The only thing known is that the start-up received money from the Fast Lane Ventures fund, whose standard seed investment is between $500,000 and $1 million. Ventures and UMJ Russia, and the total amount invested is upwards of $2 million, company sources say.

Dating sites were regarded as the least reliable source of information: no more than 12 percent of respondents trusted them.

||

The only thing known is that the start-up received money from the Fast Lane Ventures fund, whose standard seed investment is between $500,000 and $1 million. Ventures and UMJ Russia, and the total amount invested is upwards of $2 million, company sources say.Dating sites were regarded as the least reliable source of information: no more than 12 percent of respondents trusted them.

million. Ventures and UMJ Russia, and the total amount invested is upwards of million, company sources say.

Dating sites were regarded as the least reliable source of information: no more than 12 percent of respondents trusted them.